Comparison of two techniques for the detection of environmental fungi in a university campus

dc.contributor.authorBejarano, Luz Dary Caicedo
dc.contributor.authorÑañez, Cristhian Delgado
dc.contributor.authorRamírez Castrillón, Mauricio
dc.contributor.authorGiraldo, Álvaro León Rúa
dc.contributor.authorVivas, Mónica Chavez
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-09T20:03:52Z
dc.date.available2025-07-09T20:03:52Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractFungal contamination in closed or open environments has been well reported. However, studies that address airborne spores trap methods are scarce. In this study, two techniques were evaluated to detect fungal spores in the environment of three buildings of campus of a university in the city of Cali, Colombia. The gravimetric method of spore trapping was compared with the volumetric method (Air Ideal 3P) using the Omeliansky formula to determine the spore abundance. Environmental sampling was performed quarterly for a period of 12 months using dichloran rose bengal chloramphenicol agar. A total of 64,497 CFU/m3 were counted, of which 34,930 CFU/m3 were isolated using the volumetric method and 29,567 CFU/m3 using the gravimetric method. No significant statistical differences were observed between the two techniques (P = 0.0739). The predominant genera obtained with both methods were Cladosporium, Penicillium, Aspergillus, and Fusarium, which suggests that although the gravimetric method is not as efficient as the volumetric method, it is reliable in estimating environmental fungal contamination.
dc.identifier.citationBejarano, L. D. C., Ñañez, C. D., Ramírez-Castrillón, M., Giraldo, Á. L. R., & Vivas, M. C. (2021). Comparison of two techniques for the detection of environmental fungi in a university campus. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 30(4), 2995–3004. https://doi.org/10.15244/PJOES/129911 Castañeda-Morales, A., & Cuevas-Arenas, H. (2021). Between educating and perverting customs: Beginnings of the cinematographic show in valle del Cauca-Colombia (1910-1930). Cases of Cali and Buga. HiSTOReLo, 13(26), 105–132. https://doi.org/10.15446/HISTORELO.V13N26.85447
dc.identifier.issn12301485
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.usc.edu.co/handle/20.500.12421/7323
dc.language.isoen
dc.subjectAir sampling
dc.subjectFungal spores
dc.subjectGravimetric
dc.subjectOmeliansky formula
dc.subjectVolumetric
dc.titleComparison of two techniques for the detection of environmental fungi in a university campus
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Artículo.pdf
Size:
3.65 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: